FBI Director Kash Patel faced tough questions from lawmakers this week regarding a Signal chat where former Trump administration officials allegedly discussed military attack plans. While Patel himself was not part of the chat, he was asked whether the FBI would investigate.
Patel did not commit to launching an investigation and stated that he had not personally reviewed the messages, which were accidentally sent to a journalist from The Atlantic.
Can the FBI Investigate?
Former President Donald Trump dismissed the issue, saying it was “not really an FBI thing.” However, the FBI and the Justice Department have long been responsible for investigating violations of the Espionage Act, which covers the mishandling of national defense information—even if it is not classified.
The Justice Department has the power to start an investigation, but it is unclear whether Attorney General Pam Bondi, a known Trump supporter, will authorize one.
Similar Cases in the Past
Several high-profile figures have faced investigations for mishandling government secrets. However, the outcomes have varied, making it uncertain whether anyone involved in the Signal chat will face consequences.
Here are some notable past cases:
Hillary Clinton
- In 2016, Clinton was investigated for using a private email server while serving as Secretary of State.
- The FBI found that she was “extremely careless” but did not recommend charges because they could not prove she intentionally mishandled classified information.
- The decision angered Republicans, including Pam Bondi, who led chants of “Lock her up!” at the 2016 Republican National Convention.
David Petraeus
- The former CIA director leaked classified documents to his biographer, who was also his mistress.
- He kept eight binders of secret information at his home, including details about covert operatives and military strategies.
- He pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and received two years of probation, which many criticized as too lenient.
Jeffrey Sterling
- A former CIA officer, Sterling was convicted of leaking details about a secret operation to sabotage Iran’s nuclear program.
- His case was more severe than Petraeus’, yet he was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison.
- Critics pointed out a double standard, as Petraeus received a lighter sentence despite handling more sensitive materials.
What Happens Next?
It is unclear whether the FBI or Justice Department will take action against the Signal chat participants. Past cases show that political factors and legal arguments often influence investigations and punishments.
